Not a precedent says sibal

“I don't say it is a precedent. In the given situation, the government was in, it is a decision that we took with open eyes and I don't consider it to be a precedent... the government was in a particular situation,” Mr. Sibal told PTI

It is his freedom to express his views but his views need not necessarily be correct or an widely accepted view , why should it not be considered as a precedent? just because government feel unsecured it shall not lose it’s value. In a democracy a legitimate people movement shall ought to be respected and demands to be fulfilled.